Re: [PATCH RFC] __bd_forget should wait for inodes using the mapping

From: viro
Date: Fri Jun 18 2004 - 10:23:18 EST


On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 10:47:11AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> During writeback, we need to answer the question: "are there dirty pages
> attached to this inode", and the only way to answer it is via the
> address space.
>
> If bdev inodes don't want other inodes using their address space, they
> shouldn't be setting the i_mapping on other inodes. Since they are, the
> bdev code needs to be aware that someone else might be using it.

Scheduled for 2.7.1; for now users of ->i_mapping (the fewer of them remain,
the better) have to be aware of bdev.

And yes, ->i_mapping flips on "normal" bdev inodes will go away - we set
->f_mapping on open directly.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/