Re: [PATCH] PPC64 iSeries viodasd proc file

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 03:52:33PM -0400, Jeremy wrote:
> It was in the tree for the platform, not just vendor trees.  ie,
> anyone who wanted to use the platform with Linux would have had this
> functionality.  If you'd argue that people shouldn't do that, then how
> are platforms supposed to get to a point where they can be included in
> the mainline tree?

Doesn't matter.  There was a really crappy 2.4 driver that IBM didn't
even bother to submit.  So for us it simply doesn't matter it existed.

Stop whining and ensure you're employer doesn't apply broken IBM patches
instead.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/