Re: [discuss] Re: 32-bit dma allocations on 64-bit platforms

[Nick Piggin]

Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> Your code must be inferior since it doesn't even allow to tune each zone
> differently (you seems not to have a lower_zone_reserve_ratio[idx]). Not sure
> why you dont' simply forward port the code from 2.4 instead of reinventing it.

It can easily be modified if required though. Is there a need to be
tuning these different things? This is probably where we should hold
back on the complexity until it is shown to improve something.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/