Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL

[viro]

On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 02:55:01AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jul  6, 2004, Ray Lee <ray-lk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Which means 0xdeadbeef is a perfectly valid literal for an unsigned int.
> 
> Assuming ints are 32-bits wide.

ITYM "at least 32-bits wide".

>  They don't have to be.  They could be
> as narrow as 16 bits, in which case

... you would have no fscking chance to build Linux kernel on such platform
for $BIGNUM reasons.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/