Re: 2.6.7-ck5

[Redeeman]

On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 17:53 +0200, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > John Richard Moser wrote:
> >> When do you think the staircase, batch, and isometric scheduling will
> >> reach mainline-quality?  Do you think you'll be ready to ask Andrew to
> >> merge it soon, or will it be a while before it's quite ready for that?
> > 
> > 
> > Well I think they're all ready for prime time now, I just dont think 
> > prime time is ready for it. This is too large a change for mainline 2.6 
> > which keeps -ck in business ;)
> 
> I don't know whether this was already discussed, but what about adding 
> framework so that (like io-schedulers) the cpu scheduler could be chosen 
> on boot time? This would make it easy to test different cpu schedulers.
might be a good idea, but i dont think doing such a change in 2.6 is
good, but for 2.7, a good idea
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Prakash
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/