Re: [PATCH] Deadlock during heavy write activity to userspace NFS server on local NFS mount

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> >>On heavy write activity, allocators wait synchronously for kswapd to
> >>free some memory. But if kswapd is freeing memory via a userspace NFS
> >>server, that server could be waiting for kswapd, and the system seizes
> >>instantly.
> >>
> >>This patch (against RHEL 2.4.21-15EL, but should apply either 
> >>literally
> >>or conceptually to other kernels) allows a process to declare itself 
> >>as
> >>kswapd's little helper, and thus will not have to wait on kswapd.
> >>   
> >>
> >
> >Ok, but what if its memory runs out, anyway?
> >
> > 
> >
> Tough. What if kswapd's memory runs out?

I'd hope that kswapd was carefully to make sure that it always has
enough pages...

...it is harder to do the same auditing with userland program.

> A more complete solution would be to assign memory reserve levels below 
> which a process starts allocating synchronously. For example, normal 
> processes must have >20MB to make forward progress, kswapd wants >15MB 
> and the NFS server needs >10MB. Some way would be needed to express the 
> dependencies.

Yes, something like that would be neccessary. I believe it would be
slightly more complicated, like

"NFS server needs > 10MB *and working kswapd*", so you'd need 25MB in
fact... and this info should be stored in some readable form so that
it can be checked.

								Pavel
-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/