Re: inode_unused list corruption in 2.4.26 - spin_lock problem?

[Chris Caputo]

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Changing the affinity writes new values to the IOAPIC registers, I can't see
> how that could interfere with the atomicity of a spinlock operation. I dont
> understand why you think irqbalance could affect anything.

Because when I stop running irqbalance the crashes no longer happen.

Chris

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/