Re: tcp_push_pending_frames() without TCP_CORK or TCP_NODELAY

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 00:37, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:02:33 -0700
> "Robert White" <rwhite@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > 4) Cork-then-uncork would still end up with two syscalls instead of one.
> 
> Syscalls are incredible cheap, this is not an argument for not
> using cork'ing.

btw do we export MSG_MORE functionality to userspace ? That might be a
solution as well...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part