Re: secure computing for 2.6.7

[Bernd Eckenfels]

In article <Pine.LNX.4.58.0408011801260.1368@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> you wrote:
> How hard would it be to have a per-task bitmap of syscalls allowed? This
> way, a task could restrict to the exact subset of syscalls required for
> maximum security.

Which somewhat overlaps with the user-priveldeges patches and some lsm
modules, so i am not sure if this needs to be small and lean to be useful on
its own.

Bernd
-- 
eckes privat - http://www.eckes.org/
Project Freefire - http://www.freefire.org/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/