RE: tcp_push_pending_frames() without TCP_CORK or TCP_NODELAY

[Robert White]

Is there an argument _against_ providing an explicit flush?


-----Original Message-----
From: David S. Miller [mailto:davem@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2004 7:54 PM
To: arjanv@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: rwhite@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: tcp_push_pending_frames() without TCP_CORK or TCP_NODELAY

On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 10:10:06 +0200
Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> btw do we export MSG_MORE functionality to userspace ? That might be a
> solution as well...

Yes, we do.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/