Re[2]: Scheduler policies for staircase

From: Maciej Soltysiak
Date: Thu Aug 05 2004 - 09:44:30 EST


>> > Con,
>> >
>> > I have been using SCHED_BATCH on two machines now with expected
>> > results. So this you might consider this as another success report :-)
>>
>> Great. Thanks for the report. I too use them all day every day on each
>> machine I have with distributed computing clients so they're pretty well
>> tested.
I forgot to mention about something.

I totally deadlocked my machine just after setting the
/proc/sys/kernel/compute to 1 with
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/computer


The machine is 2x1G p3, and the kernel was SMP and I had experimentally
seti@home running in SCHED_BATCH mode in screen.

It was 2.6.8-rc1 with ck patches from:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/2.6/2.6.7/2.6.8-rc1/

I used these patches on 2.6.8-rc1 from it (of course in the proper
order:
__cleanup_transaction-latency-fix.patch
crq-fixes.diff
defaultcfq.diff
filemap_sync-latency-fix.patch
from_2.6.8-rc1_to_staircase7.A
get_user_pages-latency-fix.patch
jbd-recovery-latency-fix.patch
journal_clean_checkpoint_list-latency-fix.patch
kjournald-smp-latency-fix.patch
prune_dcache-latency-fix.patch
schedbatch2.3.diff
schediso2.3.diff
schedrange.diff
slab-latency-fix.patch
truncate_inode_pages-latency-fix
unmap_vmas-smp-latency-fix.patch

I haven't tried doing that again, because it is an important machine.
Just playing around with SCHED_BATCH again and reporting it.
I think I'll try to experiment on some other machine with that soon.

Regards,
Maciej



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/