Hi Andrew,
--- Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Shantanu Goel <sgoel01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I emailed this a few weeks back to the list but it
seems to have gotten lost...
It came through. I was unable to reproduce the
disproportional scanning
rate on almost exactly the same setup, so I parked
the problem for a while.
I do agree with the analysis though. The problem
_could_ occur. I dunno
why it happens for you and not for me...
Actually, the analysis turned out to be not entirely
correct. I think I have identified the offending
code. Please see attached patch. It makes kswapd()
skip zones which contain greater than "pages_high"
pages.