Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P1

[Lee Revell]

On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 01:02, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> yeah. If it's the first chunk then we could perhaps avoid it by doing it
> outside of the lock.
> 

Hmm, this is odd:

preemption latency trace v1.0
-----------------------------
 latency: 71 us, entries: 6 (6)
 process: XFree86/518, uid: 0
 nice: -10, policy: 0, rt_priority: 0
=======>
 0.000ms (+0.000ms): sched_clock (schedule)
 0.000ms (+0.000ms): deactivate_task (schedule)
 0.000ms (+0.000ms): dequeue_task (deactivate_task)
 0.001ms (+0.000ms): __switch_to (schedule)
 0.068ms (+0.066ms): finish_task_switch (schedule)
 0.069ms (+0.000ms): check_preempt_timing (sub_preempt_count)

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/