Re: kernbench on 512p

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 12:16:33PM -0400, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Here's the kernel profile.  It would be nice if the patch to show which lock 
> is contended got included.  I think it was discussed awhile back, but I don't 
> have one against the newly merged profiling code.
> [root@ascender root]# readprofile -m System.map | sort -nr | head -30
> 208218076 total                                     30.1677
> 90036167 ia64_pal_call_static                     468938.3698
> 88140492 default_idle                             229532.5312
> 10312592 ia64_save_scratch_fpregs                 161134.2500
> 10306777 ia64_load_scratch_fpregs                 161043.3906
> 8723555 ia64_spinlock_contention                 90870.3646
> 121385 rcu_check_quiescent_state                316.1068
>  40464 file_move                                180.6429
>  32374 file_kill                                144.5268
>  25316 atomic_dec_and_lock                       98.8906
>  24814 clear_page                               155.0875
>  17709 file_ra_state_init                       110.6813
>  17603 clear_page_tables                         13.4169

file_move()? file_kill()? I smell files_lock.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/