Re: kernbench on 512p

[Jesse Barnes]

On Thursday, August 19, 2004 12:29 pm, David Mosberger wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:16:33 -0400, Jesse Barnes
> >>>>> <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>
>   Jesse> It would be nice if the patch to show which lock is contended
>   Jesse> got included.
>
> Why not use q-syscollect?  It will show you the caller of
> ia64_spinlock_contention, which is often just as good (or better ;-).

Because it requires guile and guile SLIB, which I've never been able to setup 
properly on a RHEL3 based distro.  Care to rewrite the tools in C or 
something? ;)

Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/