Re: kernbench on 512p

[David Mosberger]

>>>>> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:37:16 -0400, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> said:

  Jesse> On Thursday, August 19, 2004 12:29 pm, David Mosberger wrote:
  >> >>>>> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:16:33 -0400, Jesse Barnes >>>>>
  >> <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
  >> 
  Jesse> It would be nice if the patch to show which lock is contended
  Jesse> got included.
  >>  Why not use q-syscollect?  It will show you the caller of
  >> ia64_spinlock_contention, which is often just as good (or better
  >> ;-).

  Jesse> Because it requires guile and guile SLIB, which I've never
  Jesse> been able to setup properly on a RHEL3 based distro.  Care to
  Jesse> rewrite the tools in C or something? ;)

Why not file a bug-report to Red Hat instead?  guile v1.6 and the
guile-SLIB are quite old and rather standard.

Of course, you could also run the analysis on a Debian system, which
comes standard with those packages.

	--david

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/