Re: kernbench on 512p

[Manfred Spraul]

Jesse Barnes wrote:

> Looks like a bit more context has changed.  Manfred, care to respin against 
> -mm3 so I can test?
>
>  
No problem.
Btw, who removed rcu_restart_cpu: s390 must call it after changing 
nohz_cpu_mask. Otherwise a 32-bit wraparound will lead to false 
quiescent states.

--
   Manfred
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/