Re: [PATCH] Fix shared interrupt handling of SA_INTERRUPT andSA_SAMPLE_RANDOM

[Andrew Morton]

Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Anyway, suppressing the unnecessary call of add_interrupt_randomness()
>  should be still valid.  The reduced patch is below.
> 
> 
>  Takashi
> 
>  --- linux-2.6.8.1/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c-dist	2004-08-25 13:13:05.153227112 +0200
>  +++ linux-2.6.8.1/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c	2004-08-25 13:13:34.760726088 +0200
>  @@ -220,14 +220,16 @@ asmlinkage int handle_IRQ_event(unsigned
>   		struct pt_regs *regs, struct irqaction *action)
>   {
>   	int status = 1;	/* Force the "do bottom halves" bit */
>  -	int retval = 0;
>  +	int ret, retval = 0;
>   
>   	if (!(action->flags & SA_INTERRUPT))
>   		local_irq_enable();
>   
>   	do {
>  -		status |= action->flags;
>  -		retval |= action->handler(irq, action->dev_id, regs);
>  +		ret = action->handler(irq, action->dev_id, regs);
>  +		if (ret)
>  +			status |= action->flags;
>  +		retval |= ret;
>   		action = action->next;
>   	} while (action);
>   	if (status & SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM)

Shouldn't that be `if (ret == IRQ_HANDLED)'?

Probably I'll need to pass this to lots of other architecture maintainers
to make the same change.  Please write a nice changelog so they understand
what your patch does.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/