Re: reverse engineering pwcx

[Chris Meadors]

Vojtech Pavlik wrote:

> But 160x120 sounds pretty ridiculous. It still would be possible to
> scale that to 640x480 smoothly, but the image would be obviously blurry
> and just awful even with avanced Bayer-based scaling techniques.

That sounds about right.  At 640x480 the QuickCam 3000 is an awful 
blurry mess.  Though I think the actual pixel count would be a multiple 
(divisor) of CIF, because in the nCIF resolutions it seems to expose 
more pixels.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/