Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4

[Hans Reiser]

Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Sat, 28 Aug 2004, Hans Reiser wrote:
>  
>
> > I object to openat().....
> >    
>
> Sound slike you object to O_XATTRS, not openat() itself.
>
> Realize that openat() works independently of any special streams, it's
> fundamentally a "look up name starting from this file" (rather than
> "starting from root" or "starting from cwd").
>
> 		Linus
>
>
>  
well, isn't that namespace fragmentation by definition?  If you can't go

cat filenameA/metas/permissions > filenameB/metas/permissions

find / -exec cat {}/permissions \; | grep 4777 | wc -l

then aren't you missing the whole point of this exercise which is to 
allow the whole OS to be better integrated into a more unified namespace 
so that data can leap from one tool to another, and one container to 
another, with the greatest of ease?  If cat cannot access the metadata 
without changing the code of cat, then all the elegance goes poof.

It completely baffles me what disabling filenameA/.. does for us.  Why 
add asymmetries?  Ease of implementation is no excuse for such asymmetry.

Tomorrow I am going to send a little essay I wrote this evening on these 
metafiles.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/