Re: [PATCH] Configure IDE probe delays

[Jeff Garzik]

Mark Lord wrote:
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> > > What determines whether 48 bit addressing will be used then?
> >
> >
> > Availability of 48-bit addressing feature set and host capabilities
> > (some don't support LBA48 when DMA is used etc.).
>
>
> I haven't examined the "released" IDE drivers in some time,
> but one optimisation that can save a LOT of CPU usage
> is for the driver to only use LBA48 *when necessary*,
> and use LBA28 I/O otherwise.
>
> Each access to an IDE register typically chews up 600+ns,
> or the equivalent of a couple thousand instruction executions
> on a modern core.  Avoiding LBA48 when it's not needed will
> save four such accesses per I/O, or about 2.5us.


Doing this is either pointless or impossible on newer SATA controllers. 
 Most are memory-mapped I/O not PIO, where the high-order bits of the 
ATA taskfile are accessed due to an extended register size, not 
"double-pumping" a FIFO.

Even-newer SATA controllers are FIS-based rather than taskfile-based, so 
you pass it a FIS (containing all the registers) unconditionally.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/