Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives

[Spam]

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1

> Oliver Neukum wrote:
> | Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2004 11:52 schrieb Spam:
> |
|>>  Btw, version control for ordinary files would be a great feature. I
|>>  think something like it is available through Windows 2000/3 server.
|>>  Isn't it called "Shadow Copies". It works over network shares. :)
|>>
|>>  It allows you to restore previous versions of the file even if you
|>>  delete or overwrite it.
> |
> |
> | There's no need to do that in kernel, unless you want to be able
> | to force it unto users.

> And on apps.  Should I teach OpenOffice.org to do version control?
> Seems a lot easier to just do it in the kernel, and teach everything to
> do version control in one fell swoop.

  Do you mean in the kernel or as a filesystem/VFS plugin that would
  extend the functionality to include version control?

  ~S


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/