Re: [PATCH][1/8] Arch agnostic completely out of line locks / generic

[Zwane Mwaikambo]

On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> >
> > No real reason, i have a habit of never specifying the section in the
> > definition. The following simply moves __lockfunc into spinlock.h and
> > uses it everywhere.
>
> Ok, I'm happy with this. I'll even apply it if you make a version relative
> to my -BK tree ;).

Great, i'll merge.

> Btw, there must be something wrong in your size comparison for x86:
>
> 	i386 = 524115 bytes
> 	   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
> 	5695619  870906  328112 6894637  69342d vmlinux-after
> 	6221254  870634  326864 7418752  713380 vmlinux-before
>
> The "bss" number shouldn't change as far as I can tell, and indeed, on all
> the other architectures you cite, it doesn't change. So I think your
> before/after numbers on x86 are something else.

i386 = 416075 bytes
   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
5808371  867442  326864 7002677  6ada35 vmlinux-after
6221254  870634  326864 7418752  713380 vmlinux-before

Those seem to make a lot more sense.

Thanks,
	Zwane
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/