Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 07:43:34PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Oliver Neukum wrote:
> | Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2004 11:52 schrieb Spam:
> |
> |>  Btw, version control for ordinary files would be a great feature. I
> |>  think something like it is available through Windows 2000/3 server.
> |>  Isn't it called "Shadow Copies". It works over network shares. :)
> |>
> |>  It allows you to restore previous versions of the file even if you
> |>  delete or overwrite it.
> |
> |
> | There's no need to do that in kernel, unless you want to be able
> | to force it unto users.
> 
> And on apps.  Should I teach OpenOffice.org to do version control?
> Seems a lot easier to just do it in the kernel, and teach everything to
> do version control in one fell swoop.

Just add a post-save trigger that can check it into any SCM you want.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/