RE: [PATCH] SN2 build fix CONFIG_VIRTUAL_MEM_MAP and CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM

From: tony . luck
Date: Wed Sep 08 2004 - 16:47:54 EST


>>Thanks Paul, this looks a little simpler than the patch I
>>posted (I'd rather just make CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM and
>>CONFIG_VIRTUAL_MEMMAP mandatory on ia64, but that's for
>>another patch). Linus, since this breakage is in your
>>tree now, can you please apply this assuming Tony has
>>no complaints so that people can build on ia64 again?
>
>I have no complaints. I see that Linus has already
>applied Paul's patch to his BK tree.

I want to change my vote :-) The problem isn't a spurious extra
"#else" (which Paul's patch removed) ... it is a missing "#endif"

Here's a patch that puts the #else back, adds the #endif, and
fixes the whitespace to make this nested mess of pre-processor
noise a bit more legible.

Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>

===== include/asm-ia64/page.h 1.28 vs edited =====
--- 1.28/include/asm-ia64/page.h 2004-09-05 20:48:22 +00:00
+++ edited/include/asm-ia64/page.h 2004-09-08 20:39:23 +00:00
@@ -86,13 +86,14 @@
#ifndef CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM
# ifdef CONFIG_VIRTUAL_MEM_MAP
extern struct page *vmem_map;
-# define pfn_valid(pfn) (((pfn) < max_mapnr) && ia64_pfn_valid(pfn))
-# define page_to_pfn(page) ((unsigned long) (page - vmem_map))
-# define pfn_to_page(pfn) (vmem_map + (pfn))
+# define pfn_valid(pfn) (((pfn) < max_mapnr) && ia64_pfn_valid(pfn))
+# define page_to_pfn(page) ((unsigned long) (page - vmem_map))
+# define pfn_to_page(pfn) (vmem_map + (pfn))
+# else
+# define pfn_valid(pfn) (((pfn) < max_mapnr) && ia64_pfn_valid(pfn))
+# define page_to_pfn(page) ((unsigned long) (page - mem_map))
+# define pfn_to_page(pfn) (mem_map + (pfn))
# endif
-#define pfn_valid(pfn) (((pfn) < max_mapnr) && ia64_pfn_valid(pfn))
-#define page_to_pfn(page) ((unsigned long) (page - mem_map))
-#define pfn_to_page(pfn) (mem_map + (pfn))
#endif /* CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM */

#define page_to_phys(page) (page_to_pfn(page) << PAGE_SHIFT)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/