Re: [PATCH 1/3] Separate IRQ-stacks from 4K-stacks option

[Lee Revell]

On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 02:16, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> For servers and normal desktops the current IRQ and softirq
> model is pretty OK.
> 

Agreed.  I was just pointing out that it's not safe to assume that all
hardirq handlers execute quickly.  This doesn't seem to be a problem for
normal workloads.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/