Re: kernbench on 512p

[Manfred Spraul]

Greg Edwards wrote:

> Manfred,
>
> Lockstat output attached from 2.6.9-rc2 at 512p and 2.6.9-rc2 + your two
> remaining RCU patches at 512p.  kernbench was run without any arguments.
>
> The difference for RCU looks great.
>
>  
Which value did you use for RCU_GROUP_SIZE? I'm not sure what's the 
optimal value for 512p - probably 32 or so.

--
   Manfred
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/