Re: [patch] sched: fix scheduling latencies for !PREEMPT kernels

[Ingo Molnar]

* Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> No, I mean putting cond_resched in might_sleep is ad hoc. But that
> doesn't mean it doesn't work - it obviously does ;)

ah, ok, i understand your point now. No, i'm not submitting the
CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY .config switch (and the kernel.h 2-liner) at
this point. All the latency breakers so far will mainly benefit
CONFIG_PREEMPT - which is also the primary preempt model used by
bleeding-edge testers.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/