Re: [PATCH] modular io schedulers with online switching, #2

[Mike Christie]

Jens Axboe wrote
> +void blk_wait_queue_drained(request_queue_t *q)
> +{
> +	struct request_list *rl = &q->rq;
> +	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> +
> +	set_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_DRAIN, &q->queue_flags);
> +
> +	prepare_to_wait(&rl->drain, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> +	do {
> +		spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> +		if (!rl->count[READ] && !rl->count[WRITE]) {
> +			spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		__generic_unplug_device(q);
> +		spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> +		io_schedule();
> +	} while (1);
> +	finish_wait(&rl->drain, &wait);
> +}
> +

Jens,

If a driver does not allocate requests through blk_get_request, will the 
rl->count[] tests need to be changed or do those drivers need to be 
changed? For example, if SCSI insterts a special request into the queue, 
then someone swaps the io scheduler with no outstanding normal requests 
(so the rl->counts will be zero), could the special request still be in 
the queue since it allocated its request using kmalloc (the request is 
allocated as part of the scsi command).

Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/