Re: [PATCH] Realtime LSM

[Jody McIntyre]

On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 03:01:06PM -0500, Jack O'Quin wrote:

> I was thinking that it could drop root privileges and try creating a
> realtime thread.  But, then I realied it would be better (and simpler)
> for `jackstart' to exec `jackd' unconditionally, even when the
> required capabilities are not available.  Let `jackd' figure out for
> itself what it can actually do.

I agree.  jackstart should always call jackd.  I ran into a similar
problem a few weeks ago when I gave a demo on my laptop and didn't have
time to patch my kernel.  I wasn't doing any serious recording so I
thought I'd run without -R.  Of course, that didn't work until I changed
qjackctl to use 'jackd' as a command rather than 'jackstart'.  This
could be a serious problem for a less experienced user.

Jody

> That is what I meant about trying the operation being the only
> reliable test.  Jackstart should not give up just because one
> privilege mechanism is unavailable.  It cannot know all the possible
> reasons why jackd might or might not have access to realtime
> resources.  Its job is simply to pass the capabilities if they are
> available.
> -- 
>   joq

-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/