Re: __attribute__((always_inline)) fiasco

[Richard Henderson]

On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 09:50:26AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > #define INLINE static inline  // an oxymoron
...
> The // apart from being a C++ ism (screw C99; it's still non-idiomatic)
> will cause spurious ignorance of the remainder of the line, which is
> often very important. e.g.
> 
> static INLINE int lock_need_resched(spinlock_t *lock)

No it won't.  Comments are removed in translation phase 3;
macros are expanded in translation phase 4.


r~
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/