Re: patches inline in mail

[Andrew Morton]

George Anzinger <george@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> We agree.  Still, I have been bitten too many times by misshandled white space 
>  to trust pure inlineing.  Likewise on picking it up one would usually past it in 
>  the mail (I suppose) where as the attachment is through the mailer and less 
>  prone to missing a character.
> 
>  The best answer, I think, is attachments that show as inline AND stay that way 
>  on the reply.
> 
>  Guild lines on how to insure this are welcome.

Send angry email to everyone@xxxxxxxxxxxx  AFAICT it's impossible with
recent mailnews.

Slightly more on-topic:

+int do_posix_clock_process_gettime(struct timespec *tp);
+int do_posix_clock_process_settime(struct timespec *tp);
+int do_posix_clock_thread_gettime(struct timespec *tp);
+int do_posix_clock_thread_settime(struct timespec *tp);

These should all be given static scope.

And it would be nice to structure the code so the forward decl isn't
needed, if poss.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/