Re: [PATCH] NFS using CacheFS

From: Clemens Schwaighofer
Date: Fri Oct 08 2004 - 10:46:22 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/08/2004 08:22 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
>
>> brr :) why is it posix, this is so out of the context for me (as a
>> user). Is it possible to have a cachefs flag. Would make it more logical.
>
>
> Because it was the easiest way to get things started (i.e. no userlevel
> changes needed at all).... The 'fscache' flag will be coming along with
> the nfs4 support, since nfs4 mounting code does not have an open
> (unused) mounting flag....

okay, thank you for the information. Anyway inbetween I will try that
out with NFS3 ...

lg, clemens

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBZrTAjBz/yQjBxz8RAoddAJwIVyxuMFy0tD9H8z8D/UKjXmvAtgCg4mcY
2NZyYRCsdR6CzbTKKcJiybw=
=sKPN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/