Re: Weirdness with suspending jobs in 2.6.9-rc3

From: Petri Kaukasoina
Date: Mon Oct 11 2004 - 22:41:06 EST


On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 01:55:05PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > wait4(-1073750280, NULL, 0, NULL) = -1 ECHILD (No child processes)
>
> That is a clearly bogus argument.

Hi. I see it too:

wait4(-1073750328, NULL, 0, NULL) = -1 ECHILD (No child processes)

But the whole problem goes away if I switch CONFIG_REGPARM off. To reproduce
it needs CONFIG_REGPARM=y.

Hope this helps.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/