Re: NUMA: Patch for node based swapping

From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Tue Oct 12 2004 - 15:23:12 EST


On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Rik van Riel wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
> > Any other suggestions?
>
> Since this is meant as a stop gap patch, waiting for a real
> solution, and is only relevant for big (and rare) systems,
> it would be an idea to at least leave it off by default.
>
> I think it would be safe to assume that a $100k system has
> a system administrator looking after it, while a $5k AMD64
> whitebox might not have somebody watching its performance.

Ok. Will do that then. Should I submit the patch to Andrew?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/