Re: per-process shared information

From: Marcelo Tosatti
Date: Thu Oct 14 2004 - 18:49:43 EST



Hi Andrea!

No useful comments on the statm reporting issue.

> Ps. if somebody like Hugh volunteers implementing it, you're very
> welcome, just let me know (I'll eventually want to work on the oom
> handling too, which is pretty screwed right now,

Yes, we've got reports of bad OOM killing behaviour (is that what you're
talking about?)

One thing is the removal of "if (nr_swap_pages > 0) goto out" from oom_kill()
causes problems (spurious oom kill).

We need to throttle more, on page reclaiming progress I think.

Take a look at

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-mm&m=109587921204602&w=2

What else you're seeing?

> I've plenty of bugs
> open on that area and the lowmem zone protection needs a rewrite too to
> be set to a sane default value no matter the pages_lows etc..).

Nick has been working on that lately I think. What is the problem?



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/