Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U5

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Tue Oct 19 2004 - 04:14:15 EST


On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 11:04, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > All sleep_on variants trigger the irqs_disabled() check in schedule().
> > tglx
>
> ah, forgot that the waitqueue lock is a raw lock. Is there _any_
> scenario where sleep_on() is actually correct kernel code?

Hmm, the sleep_on() variants are used quite a lot over the kernel. Whats
wrong with them and to what should they be converted ?

tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/