Re: Hugepages demand paging V1 [3/4]: Overcommit handling

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 12:16:26PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> I thought that was the state of the art for hugetlb pages already?

On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 04:21:01AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> Only vacuously so, for mainline is not handling hugetlb faults.
> The real impediment to all this is that no one is bothering to dredge
> up architecture manuals for the architectures they're touching to
> create plausible equivalents of update_mmu_cache(), clear_dcache_page()
> (not considered by Lameter's patches at all), et al for hugetlb.

flush_dcache_page(), sorry.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/