Re: Temporary NFS problem when rpciod is SIGKILLed

[Jan Engelhardt]

>That's the point. It works in 2.4

Maybe because there is no rpciod in 2.4?

>Well, let's see. 2.4 works. rpciod in 2.6 shows this erratic behaviour
>even if I do "kill -9 <pid_of_rpciod>", thus no other process, kernel
>or userspace, know about this KILL.

Is rpciod (a kthread as I read from your 'ps' output) killable in 2.4 after
all?
Maybe the rpciod-26 is missing a sigblock()?


Jan Engelhardt
-- 
Gesellschaft fЭr Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung
Am Fassberg, 37077 GЖttingen, www.gwdg.de
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/