Re: The naming wars continue...

[H. Peter Anvin]

Followup to:  <20041025232654.GC30574@xxxxxxxxxxx>
By author:    Tonnerre <tonnerre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> 
> Salut,
> 
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 03:33:33PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> > Yes - lets stick to fewer numbers.  They can count faster, instead
> > of having a long string of them.  I hope linux doesn't
> > end up like X. "X11R6.8.1" The "X" itself is a counter, although
> > it is understandable if it never increments to "Y".  But
> > that "11" doesn't change much, and then there are three more numbers. :-/
> 
> X11  is the  name of  the  protocol: the  X Protocol,  version 11,  as
> released by the MIT. There was an X10.
> 

There also were a W, and and X1, X2, ... X11.

However, there is a tendency for numbers to get stuck (witness Linux
2.x).  In particular, X11R6 got encoded in many places including
pathnames for no good reason.  Under the pre-R6 naming schemes we'd
had R7 a long time ago.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/