Re: [patch 7/7] uml: resolve symbols in back-traces

[Blaisorblade]

On Thursday 28 October 2004 00:27, akpm@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>

> Resolve symbols in back-traces.

> Signed-off-by: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
The idea is right - I already had it in my tree, with some little changes (for 
instance including the symbol address and so on). So I'll send it reviewed a 
bit.

I had not yet sent it because there was more critical stuff and because 
sometimes on panic it does not work yet - this seems to be a missing flush 
from the UML console drivers :-(, a bit long to solve because currently the 
locking is broken (a semaphore is used in process context, nothing in 
interrupt context).

And removing the final Emacs comment is not welcome (I don't care, but Jeff 
does. If that should be removed, that's a separate problem).

Bye
-- 
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/