Re: [Fwd: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.4]

From: Florian Schmidt
Date: Mon Nov 01 2004 - 08:44:59 EST


On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:15:11 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > [...] I am too seeing rtc_wakeup weirdnesses that were not present in
> > earlier -V0.6 kernels.
>
> this turned out to be a user error - used the wrong script to renice
> IRQ8. Perhaps rtc_wakeup could check for the presence of IRQ 8 and chrt
> it to 99 if it's present? :-|

Hi,

well, how would i best check for the presence of the process/thread "IRQ 8"?
A quick glance through the output of apropos pid didn't show anything. i
suppose in the worst case i'd have to iterate over the list of all processes
and find the one that matches the name. Dunno how to do that either yet. If
it's fairly straightforward, i'll add it.

Although: is rtc always garanteed to be "IRQ 8" or is this only the case on
ia32 with XT-PIC?

?

flo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/