Re: [PATCH 504] m68k: smp_lock.h: Avoid recursive include

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > This one is _totally_ broken. 
> > 
> > Not only is that include not recursive, but it immediately breaks any SMP 
> > compile because that header file _needs_ the definition of "task_struct".
> >
> > On Sun, 31 Oct 2004, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > smp_lock.h: Avoid recursive include
> > > 
> > > --- linux-2.6.10-rc1/include/linux/smp_lock.h       2004-04-28 15:47:31.000000000 +0200
> > > +++ linux-m68k-2.6.10-rc1/include/linux/smp_lock.h  2004-10-20 22:24:05.000000000 +0200
> > > @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
> > >  #define __LINUX_SMPLOCK_H
> > >  
> > >  #include <linux/config.h>
> > > -#include <linux/sched.h>
> 
> 
> Shouldn't you also revert cset 1.2405, also by Geert, which added
> <linux/sched.h> to reiserfs_fs.h?  Looks like that was done to fix
> breakage caused by this change.

You can discuss about that: reiserfs_fs.h used current including sched.h.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/