Re: [patch] inotify: idr stuff

From: Gene Heskett
Date: Tue Nov 02 2004 - 21:53:29 EST


On Monday 01 November 2004 15:28, Robert Love wrote:
>John.
>
>MAX_ID_MASK is already set to the maximum IDR value, so we don't
> need to add IDR_MAX_ID. I know this was my idea--I was, uh, being
>metaphoric. :)
>
>Plus, MAX_ID_MASK is computed based on IDR_BITS, so it is "always
>right."
>
>Also add an IWATCHES_HARD_LIMIT, set to MAX_ID_MASK, instead of
> using MAX_ID_MASK directly.
>
>Finally, this uncovers that idr.h is not protected against double
>inclusion, so wrap it in ifndef's.
>
>Best,
>
> Robert Love

Anybody know whats going on, I just got 8 copies of this
[...]

--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.28% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/