Re: [patch 09/20] uml: use SIG_IGN for empty sighandler

[Jeff Dike]

blaisorblade_spam@xxxxxxxx said:
> Avoid creating a dummy no-op procedure instead of using SIG_IGN. 

Andrew, can you hold off on this one?  I did that on purpose, and as soon
as I remember why, I'll know whether this patch is good :-)

The other patches are OK by me.  Consider them acked.

				Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/