Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 09/20] uml: use SIG_IGN for empty sighandler

From: Blaisorblade
Date: Wed Nov 03 2004 - 23:36:01 EST


On Thursday 04 November 2004 05:51, Jeff Dike wrote:
> blaisorblade_spam@xxxxxxxx said:
> > Avoid creating a dummy no-op procedure instead of using SIG_IGN.
>
> Andrew, can you hold off on this one?

> I did that on purpose, and as soon
> as I remember why, I'll know whether this patch is good :-)
I had a doubt on this, but I was not getting much feedback from you...
Also, if you reject this, I'd require a comment-only patch for it:
"as soon as I remember why" makes me think back to my yesterday's class, when
the teacher said "put comments in your code or you'll soon forget what it
does!" 8-O (yes, 1st year University student :-( ).

> The other patches are OK by me. Consider them acked.
Very fine.

--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature