RE: Possible GPL infringement in Broadcom-based routers

[Adam J. Richter]

>  == David Schwartz
>> == Jerome Petozzoni

>> Can Broadcom and the vendors "escape" the obligations of the GPL by
>> shipping those proprietary drivers as modules, or are they violating the
>> GPL plain and simple by removing the related source code (and showing
>> irrelevant code to show "proof of good will") ?
>
>        That is a contentious issue that has been debated on this group far too
>much. In the United States, at least, the answer comes down to the complex
>legal question of whether the module is a "derived work" of the Linux kernel
>and whether the kernel as shipped with those modules is a "mere
>aggregation".

	I am not a lawyer, so please do not use this as legal advice.

	I think you're missing the idea that that such drivers are
_contributory_ infringement to the direct infringement that occurs when
the user loads the module.  In other words, even for a driver that has
not a byte of code derived from the kernel, if all its uses involve it
being loaded into a GPL'ed kernel to form an infringing derivative
work in RAM by the user committing direct copyright infringement against
numerous GPL'ed kernel components, then it fails the test of having
a substantial non-infringing use, as established in the Betamax decision,
and distributing it is contributory infringement of those GPL'ed
components of the kernel.

                    __     ______________ 
Adam J. Richter        \ /
adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx      | g g d r a s i l
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/