Re: [patch 2.6.10-rc1-bk] shrink struct device a bit

[Russell King]

On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 08:37:31PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> Two fields were duplicates of ones in the PM struct,
> and weren't much used in any case.

> +#else	/* !CONFIG_PM */
> +#define sa1111_resume	0
> +#define sa1111_suspend	0
...
> +#else
> +#define	neponset_suspend	0
> +#define	neponset_resume	0
> +#endif

I think sparse will complain at being given '0' instead of 'NULL' for
pointers.  Please use NULL instead.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 PCMCIA      - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
                 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/