Re: CELF interest in suspend-to-flash
From: Nigel Cunningham
Date: Wed Nov 10 2004 - 14:20:16 EST
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 02:41, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 05:06:31AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> > On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 04:59, Tim Bird wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Lately, the CE Linux Forum power management working group is showing some
> > > interest in suspend-to-flash. Is there any current work in this area?
> > >
> > > Who should we talk to if we want to get involved with this (or lead
> > > an effort if there isn't one)?
> > Can flash be treated as a swap device at the moment? If so, it might
> > simply be a matter of specifying the same parameter used in swapon for
> > the resume2= boot parameter.
> Sure, you only need to have the flash as a block device (ie driven
> by the IDE code).
Cool. In that case, it should work fine with either swsusp (the mainline
implementation) or suspend2.
Christian Reformed Church of Tuggeranong
PO Box 1004, Tuggeranong, ACT 2901
You see, at just the right time, when we were still powerless, Christ
died for the ungodly. -- Romans 5:6
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/