Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: [PATCH] fbdev: Fix IO access in rivafb

From: Guido Guenther
Date: Fri Nov 12 2004 - 14:31:01 EST


On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 08:01:00AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Guido Guenther wrote:
> >
> > Doesn't work for me. This one works:
> >
> > diff -u -u linux-2.6.10-rc1-mm5.orig/drivers/video/riva/riva_hw.h linux-2.6.10-rc1-mm5/drivers/video/riva/riva_hw.h
> > --- linux-2.6.10-rc1-mm5.orig/drivers/video/riva/riva_hw.h 2004-11-12 13:42:54.000000000 +0100
> > +++ linux-2.6.10-rc1-mm5/drivers/video/riva/riva_hw.h 2004-11-12 13:47:29.400807920 +0100
> > @@ -75,12 +75,12 @@
> > */
> > #include <asm/io.h>
> >
> > -#define NV_WR08(p,i,d) (__raw_writeb((d), (void __iomem *)(p) + (i)))
> > -#define NV_RD08(p,i) (__raw_readb((void __iomem *)(p) + (i)))
> > -#define NV_WR16(p,i,d) (__raw_writew((d), (void __iomem *)(p) + (i)))
> > -#define NV_RD16(p,i) (__raw_readw((void __iomem *)(p) + (i)))
> > -#define NV_WR32(p,i,d) (__raw_writel((d), (void __iomem *)(p) + (i)))
> > -#define NV_RD32(p,i) (__raw_readl((void __iomem *)(p) + (i)))
> > +#define NV_WR08(p,i,d) (writeb((d), (u8 __iomem *)(p) + (i)))
> > +#define NV_RD08(p,i) (readb((u8 __iomem *)(p) + (i)))
> > +#define NV_WR16(p,i,d) (__raw_writew((d), (u16 __iomem *)(p) + (i)/2))
> > +#define NV_RD16(p,i) (__raw_readw((u16 __iomem *)(p) + (i)/2))
> > +#define NV_WR32(p,i,d) (__raw_writel((d), (u32 __iomem *)(p) + (i)/4))
> > +#define NV_RD32(p,i) (__raw_readl((u32 __iomem *)(p) + (i)/4))
>
> Can you please try without the broken "u16" and "(i/2)" things (and u32
> and i/4)? They really should not be needed, unless something is
> _seriously_ broken. The only thing they do is the automatically align the
> reference - and quite frankly, it looks like anybody passing an unaligned
> register offset is _quite_ buggy.
O.k., it was the __raw_{write,read}b which broke things, not the
"alignment". This one works:

diff -u -u linux-2.6.10-rc1-mm5.orig/drivers/video/riva/riva_hw.h linux-2.6.10-rc1-mm5/drivers/video/riva/riva_hw.h
--- linux-2.6.10-rc1-mm5.orig/drivers/video/riva/riva_hw.h 2004-11-12 13:42:54.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc1-mm5/drivers/video/riva/riva_hw.h 2004-11-12 17:39:22.000000000 +0100
@@ -75,8 +75,8 @@
*/
#include <asm/io.h>

-#define NV_WR08(p,i,d) (__raw_writeb((d), (void __iomem *)(p) + (i)))
-#define NV_RD08(p,i) (__raw_readb((void __iomem *)(p) + (i)))
+#define NV_WR08(p,i,d) (writeb((d), (void __iomem *)(p) + (i)))
+#define NV_RD08(p,i) (readb((void __iomem *)(p) + (i)))
#define NV_WR16(p,i,d) (__raw_writew((d), (void __iomem *)(p) + (i)))
#define NV_RD16(p,i) (__raw_readw((void __iomem *)(p) + (i)))
#define NV_WR32(p,i,d) (__raw_writel((d), (void __iomem *)(p) + (i)))

Signed-off-by: Guido Guenther <agx@xxxxxxxxxxx>

> IOW, it would seem that the real difference is the "__raw_writeb" vs
> "writeb". Can you test just that change?
>
> > #define VGA_WR08(p,i,d) NV_WR08(p,i,d)
> > #define VGA_RD08(p,i) NV_RD08(p,i)
> >
> > Interesting enough this one doesn't (only differenc in NV_{WR,RW}08:
> >
>
> I don't see the difference to your other patch. Did you put in the wrong
> patch?
There aren't any, I actually attached the wrong patch. The non-working
version has __raw_{read,write}b8 instead of {read,write}b8. In 2.6.9
riva_hw.h used {in,out}_8 for NV_{RD,WR}08 so using the "non-raw"
writeb/readb now looks correct since these map to {in,out}_8 now.
Cheers,
-- Guido
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/